from the desk of the publisher

Posted by on Nov 17th, 2011 and filed under Community News, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

The Definition of “Reporting”

Robin Goldsworthy is the publisher of the Crescenta Valley Weekly. She can be reached at or (818) 248-2740.

With advances in technology happening as fast as they are, it is not surprising that truth and ethics are being debated and in some cases redefined. Especially in the industry of journalism, where the standard was that if it was in print it was considered almost sacred. Of course, this theory was flawed – “yellow journalism” and tabloid news found readership as the public showed interest – sometimes bordering on mania – to find out the most salacious bits of information about its celebrities, politicians or other high profile figures.

However, the power of the pen prevailed as it was hard to argue with someone who was holding the newspaper in their hand, pointing to the inaccurate news piece and demanding a retraction.

While the power of the pen is still mighty, one cannot ignore the availability for anyone to share information and opinion in cyberspace. The problem becomes the blurring of the two – what is factual information and what is opinion.

Being the CV Weekly publisher, I am accountable for those news items that appear in the Weekly. When one of my writers reports on a fire, a burglary or local development for example, I take responsibility that the information is accurate and fair. That is the foundation of truth in media.

While I know that there will be errors – all the fact checking in the world cannot avoid it – I will readily take responsibility and own those as well. After all, I am the one accountable.

And that is the challenge with blogging and online news sources. Who exactly is accountable for the inaccuracies that are posted “out there”?

Perhaps part of the problem is the definition of blogging. “Blog” has been described as a “personal diary,” “a daily pulpit,” “a collaborative space,” “a political soapbox,” “a breaking-news outlet,” “a collection of links,” “your own private thoughts.”

Note that none of these definitions has the term “truth” or “reporting” in it.

Understand that I am a lover of the Internet. I love that information is at my fingertips. However, I know the difference between a reliable news source and someone’s opinion. Not everyone does, however, and when something is posted or misrepresented as a news item it can cause damage.

Case in point is a recent comment by a blogger who was invited to blog about the Thieves Market on the Montrose Patch. Patch is an online service that is self-described as “a community-specific news and information platform dedicated to providing comprehensive and trusted local coverage for individual towns and communities.” The Thieves Market, a part of the Montrose Harvest Market, is going through transition right now. The Montrose Shopping Park Assn. oversees the market and is considering making changes to its Thieves Market. The vendors that make up the Thieves Market are understandably worried about the possible changes and how it affects their future.

On Nov. 6, the following was posted: “Let us not forget that Robin Goldsworthy of the Crescenta Valley Weekly is on the MSPA [Montrose Shopping Park Assn.] Board and cannot report with total freedom of press so we depend on media like the Montrose Patch to tell the Thieves Market story …”

I am not a member of the Montrose Shopping Park Assn. Never was nor could I be. The association is composed of those who own a business in the Montrose Shopping Park. I was, however, part of the MSPA Events Committee, along with representatives of the Montrose-Verdugo City Chamber of Commerce, the City of Glendale, the Sparr Heights Business District Assn. and the MSPA. One of the goals of the committee was to work together to coordinate events that would complement each area and not take place at the same time – not exactly a controversial committee.

I challenge this blogger to show examples of when I could not “report with total freedom” on something.

Anyone has the right to offer an opinion, but when wrong information is presented as fact not only can it damage the person who is in the accuser’s cross-hairs, but it also undermines the validity of the hosting agency.

Until a solid hierarchy of responsibility is established regarding information on the Internet and those who host random rantings, there is more truth than I care for as quoted by Elliott Gould’s character in the recent movie “Contagion”: Blogging is [just] graffiti with punctuation.

Categories: Community News, News

4 Responses for “from the desk of the publisher”

  1. Kathleen Hoffman says:

    While I do agree with you that journalism today is in a terrible state, in which opinion is presented as fact, I also lament the loss of due diligence on the part of local media in covering its community and that community’s concerns. In Los Angeles, a mayor and city council, in a dearth of media oversight, sell their every action to the highest bidder — developers — destroying residents quality of life. Here, in our beloved foothills, the treasured Harvest and Thieves Market appears to be subject to the fears of local business owners, with residents and market-goers (not to mention vendors) unable to get information about the future of the market. I would like to see you and your tireless staff report definitively on this, and hold the MSPA accountable for its actions or laud them for a job well done.

    Thank you.

  2. Tadeh Ohanian says:

    No one that reads blogs takes it as a reliable news source. Obviously there is a huge difference and those that read blogs and news articles (believe it or not) are smart enough to discern the difference. I believe blogs are what ancient reporters of the paper age refer to as an “opinion piece”.

    “Blogging is [just] graffiti with punctuation.”

    I don’t think you know what a blog is, and as a journalist in this changing world, you should probably do more research. Ironically, this “article” reads more like a blog post. On top of that, I can’t believe you had the audacity to refer to this blog post as “The Definition of “Reporting”. I believe you’re the one trying to pass your opinion (of something you don’t understand) as fact.

    • Thank you for taking the time to write. The point I was making is that unfortunately when a blog is misrepresented as fact it can damage the reputation of a person or business with little or no recourse for the injured party. I think that a well established hierarchy of responsibility is necessary where one can go when misinformation or outright lies are posted disguised as truth.

      You are right – this opinion piece is written exactly as a blog – it is plainly an opinion piece, not buried in the news section and as such will not be mistaken for news but for an opinion. Again, my concern is when bloggers offer information as fact that is not documented but presented as certified.

      As far as not knowing what a blog is, I gave seven examples of common definitions thereby qualifying my knowledge of what a blog is.

  3. alyce russell says:

    Thank you Robin. You are a trusted source of information. I know when I pick up the CV Weekly I am getting a fair and a balanced story. It is amazing to me that any journalist would not want to strive for your reputation. Again, I thank you for the time, effort and responsibility you take to put out an honest and worthwhile paper.

Leave a Reply


Photo Gallery
  /  Los Angeles Web Design By Caspian Services, Inc.